Overestimation of Bitcoin's Capabilities: The author's argument that Bitcoin can significantly address wealth inequality underestimates the complexity of economic disparities. Wealth inequality is influenced by numerous factors beyond just monetary policy, including education, access to resources, and regulatory environments.

Neglect of Volatility and Adoption Barriers: By promoting Bitcoin as a stable alternative to fiat currencies, the article overlooks the significant volatility that cryptocurrencies typically exhibit. This volatility can be a barrier to widespread adoption, especially as a stable medium of exchange.

Simplification of Economic Theories: The discussion of the Cantillon Effect, while insightful, simplifies the transmission mechanisms of monetary policy. The reality is that the impact of new money entering the economy is mediated by a variety of complex factors, not just the sequence of who receives the money first.

Underestimation of Regulatory and Practical Challenges: The transition to a Bitcoin-dominated system would involve significant regulatory and infrastructural changes. The article does not fully address the practical challenges that such a shift would entail, including resistance from governments and entrenched financial institutions.

The arguments would benefit from a more nuanced exploration of these issues, recognizing the limitations and challenges of implementing Bitcoin as a widespread economic solution.

You’ve got enough of it right to be in the ballpark, but too much of wrong for anybody who has actually been following this stuff.

Maybe take a look at this one
https://bombthrower.com/the-wef-isnt-a-cabal-its-a-cult/

Crypto is not our revolution.

It's theirs.

Or did you think that Satoshi was real?

I understand you may disagree (due to being ignorant of real historical facts) but resorting to such ad hominem as a response is silly. I recently came across your website and thought it was ran by a serious person.

The 'French' Revolution was not French in nature. It was orchestrated from outside (namely the financial powers of Britain and Switzerland) and pro-British factions within France (the Duke of Orleans, Necker, Dalton, the Enlightened movement, et al.) to prevent another 'American' style successful revolution against Britain, this time, on European soil. France and others were under the grip of Britain (who imposed destructive economic policies) and knew they could break free after seeing the American colonies take a stand and win. Britain prevented it.

The 'Russian' revolution was also not Russia in origin. It was designed by outsiders and carried out with pro-outsider factions. The same applies to virtually all revolutions to date. Grass-root in looks. Foreign in DNA.

Oh *gawd* here come the Jeff Rense skinheads…

Except that the 'French' Revolution was not French to begin with.

> (their own excepted)

Yeah exactly, those who dont wanna be in on the WEF scam will be better off opting out of those "less options framwork" they are "proposing"

And putting so much Faith in a system (BTC) that one is not in control of seems pretty stupid.

Michael Hudson a reasonable and rational voice from the left of center / progressive slice of the spectrum. Have a couple of his other books sitting around here somewhere (Supercapitalism? )

Thought I ordered the new one but I don't remember it showing up.

Michael Hudson has a book out 'and forgive them their debts' that tells of the ancient practice of debt jubilees done by the monarch/tyrant for the purpose of preserving social order and cohesiveness. These also served to preserve the system of privilege for the elites, instead of allowing it to reach its ultimate conclusion ala the French Revolution. They did them whenever needed, and did not have them on an arbitrary timeline like Israel established. These fell out of use with the absolute growth in the elite numbers, who did not want to give up any sums that might be owed them. The current elite answer to this is a concerted. effort to reduce and disable the wealthiest global populations (their own excepted) under the guise of the climate hoax.