Comments on: Geoengineering a Psychic Storm

By: max

max — Fri, 25 Oct 2024 20:32:41 +0000

The Conspiracy Theory of History Revisited by Murray N. Rothbard
Anytime that a hard-nosed analysis is put forth of who our rulers are, of how their political and economic interests interlock, it is invariably denounced by Establishment liberals and conservatives (and even by many libertarians) as a “conspiracy theory of history,” “paranoid,” “economic determinist,” and even “Marxist.” These smear labels are applied across the board,
It is no wonder that usually these realistic analyses are spelled out by various “extremists” who are outside the Establishment consensus. For it is vital to the continued rule of the State apparatus that it have legitimacy and even sanctity in the eyes of the public, and it is vital to that sanctity that our politicians and bureaucrats be deemed to be disembodied spirits solely devoted to the “public good.” Once let the cat out of the bag that these spirits are all too often grounded in the solid earth of advancing a set of economic interests through use of the State, and the basic mystique of government begins to collapse.
There are, of course, good conspiracy analysts and bad conspiracy analysts, just as there are good and bad historians or practitioners of any discipline. The bad conspiracy analyst tends to make two kinds of mistakes, which indeed leave him open to the Establishment charge of “paranoia.” First, he stops with the cui bono; if measure A benefits X and Y, he simply concludes that therefore X and Y were responsible. He fails to realize that this is just a hypothesis, and must be verified by finding out whether or not X and Y really did so.

By: Nike

Nike — Wed, 23 Oct 2024 22:35:28 +0000

Thank you for providing a intelligent, well needed counterpoint to the streams of frothing bs we are being inundated with from BOTH sides.

By: Paul Modrell

Paul Modrell — Wed, 23 Oct 2024 13:38:38 +0000

I watch you on the War Room and like your contributions in the area transhumanism. Within this field of study you sound very similar to how Dane Wigington sounds within his field of study so I don't understand where you're coming from in this attack on his credibility. You might be the tech advisor over there but you';re venturing out of your lane. Stick to transhumanism.

By: Paul Modrell

Paul Modrell — Wed, 23 Oct 2024 13:37:17 +0000

I watch you on the War Room and like your contributions in the area transhumanism. Within this field of study you sound very similar to how Dane Wigington sounds within his field of study so I don't understand where you're coming from in this attack on his credibility. You might be the tech advisor over there but you're venturing out of your lane. Stick to transhumanism.

By: Fran

Fran — Wed, 23 Oct 2024 13:26:18 +0000

So explain why the Government of NC is now buying all the distressed property they can from the people, to turn into parks and open space, or more likely "15 minute cities?"

They are doing the same in Hawaii …explain that?

By: Brett

Brett — Wed, 23 Oct 2024 10:19:17 +0000

The one aspect of this article that left me a little unsatisfied is you do a good job of skewering wigington but then go on to list off several geoengineering active plots which makes the reader say hey, on the one hand this guy whose dedicated his life to exposing this sinister activity is a crank, apparently specifically because of the tech he identifies as the driver you call bunk, but what about a run down of the plots and experiments you yourself list as legitimately real ?

By: martin

martin — Wed, 23 Oct 2024 04:55:18 +0000

The lines below are exceedingly self – contradictory.
You say it doesn't exist and then say basically that it does. Well which is it?

'First, I want most or all extant and future geoengineering programs halted, and any covert programs declassified (and maybe punished). '