I just found your page and found your article to be a very interesting read. It's so hard to find good articles these days. It's usually 30 of the same flash points of the day, at times with some subtle slant and at other times a collective insertion of the same story. While alternative news used to be great at the underdog approach and finding the kernel that sets them apart from MSM.

More and more they appear like a deer in the headlights. Unable to sift through the macramé of actual news worthy formula hidden deep within. I don't know if it's laziness or just the impossibility of finding what is actually news worthy, or the capture of truth. As of recent it's like a bunch of cheer leaders. Which is what we all find disgusting about MSM.

Many of us attempt through the alternative media to grasp the actual reality of our world. We know full well MSM is never going to create anything but propaganda as corporate media is the bag holder for its corporate sponsors. This was very obvious during the pandemic though few seemed to grasp the reality.
Many paid with their lives by simply advocating the sound bites and proving why many of us considered them sheep, androids, irrational and schizophrenic.

It's not to say we were more brave, cunning, or educated. We simply already distrusted the system and had a better understanding of how things work. We were objective and questioned when others simply towed the line. Even with the obvious eventually disclosed many refused it. Sick, dying, or at least less healthy and still unable to divorce themselves.

That speaks volumes and is truly horrifying if you really indulge your manic side. The same group would consider Hitler a world assassin from hell, yet is unable to see the simple truth that they themselves would not only sponsor and indulge it but adopt it as the highest principle of human existence and suppress and kill anyone who disagreed.

I had studied world war two a lot and always wondered how did Hitler create a mass psychosis so powerful. I no longer wonder.

You wrote:

> It’s the blueprint for what I’ve already been noticing,
> not just in the US but everywhere, that I’ve been
> calling **State Capitalism**.
>
> It’s the fused-lattice model of corporate-state power
> where the company doesn’t lobby the government,
> it is part of the governing apparatus, and the government
> in turn provides the regulatory moat that keeps the
> company’s competitors out, and to whom they can
> outsource things that national governments aren’t
> supposed to be doing.

I'm reminded of the specious term "Crony Capitalism": Private profits, but socialized losses; benefits for connected fellow-travelers, at the expense of unconnected rubes.

Because these things depend upon *involuntary* interaction (namely taxation; or, a culturally acceptable application of violent imposition), it seems to me that "capitalism" cannot possibly be the correct word; "capital" as a concept has meaning only when a resource is the direct object of an *ownership* that is well defined among all participants in advance of their interaction. Indeed, due to the inherent re-distribution of wealth (or at least re-distribution of decision-making power), what you describe better matches "socialism" of some variety—those who are in The Club are cared for, while those outside are merely useful tools.

I say, Bitcoin Capitalist, why should we denigrate and dilute our own terms?

Call it what it is: "*Socialism*". It is *State Socialism*; it is *Crony Socialism*. Add some nationalism to it, and you've got *National Socialism*; convert it to globalism and you've got *International Socialism*; sprinkle on some Marxism (a theory about power dynamics between the Haves and the Have Nots), and you've got *Communism*. The common component among all of these phenomena is *Socialism*: The desire for and ruthless pursuit of the fruits of someone else's labor.

The story changed my life. It opened my eyes to the coming slave economy, and I realized then, as a 12 year-old boy in 1970, that a lot of people had to die for Big Brother to take over.

And here we are. Big Brother is here, and the noose slowly tightens. People still have to die, and by the 100's of millions. The Technate knows this. Resistance is futile. The main threat to the technate is anglo males (same race as those who generally built the machine), so predominately anglo cultures have to be injected with non-anglos in order to thin the soup. There will be the "haves"; and there will be everyone else – a third-world, mostly brown step-n-fetch-it ruled by Ai.

The Ai hallucination is nothing more or less than a race for the throne. I use a few Ai entities almost every day, 's that was thrilling to play with but it's limitations were quickly apparent. With the various Ai's I pay for to use, one has to dig a little farther to get to their panic-driven "I must provide a solution" mode. "A solution" not "THE solution". Then the Ai is exposed in all it's super-search-tool glory: a fancy search tool that is politically correct and driven to apply a "solution" based on the values of its programming. Yandex gives far more targeted search results than any other search tool I use and it is gaining market share nicely.

So 1984 has been upon us for years now. The Final Solution will swallow up the world soon enough. Famine is mos def at the door. Palantir is ideal for identifying threats to the Brave New World.

Remember JadeHELM? Remember how technology was used to digitally round up the ? Jade – an Ai developed by the government back in the 80's and 90's? Jade went dark in 1992,3 or 4, I forget. But the exercise was to see if a technology could game-plan a reliable military strike against concentrations of veterans and Jade did a very good job of that. Arizona seemed to be the locus of veteran concentration, if memory serves.

Without personal liberty, life is hardly worth living. We become a mere gene-set, slouching through our lives, hoping we can achieve some kind of meaning and control over our lives. Better to fight and possibly die for liberty than to accept the yoke of serfdom. Liberty is at minimum exciting. Mere existence is only death waiting to happen.

Don't let the implied threat of the government slaughter at Waco and Ruby Ridge intimidate you. Liberty comes at a cost but absolutely yes, it is worth fighting for. I do believe that God is on the side of Righteous men who fight for righteous causes. Certainly liberty and justice, based on His definitions, are worthy of battle. The other route…

Pink Floyd – "Brain Damage"

"The lunatic is on the grass
The lunatic is on the grass
Remembering games and daisy chains and laughs
Got to keep the loonies on the path
The lunatic is in the hall
The lunatics are in my hall
The paper holds their folded faces to the floor
And every day the paperboy brings more
And if the dam breaks open many years too soon
And if there is no room upon the hill
And if your head explodes with dark forebodings too
I'll see you on the dark side of the moon

You raise the blade, you make the change
You re-arrange me 'til I'm sane
You lock the door
And throw away the key
There's someone in my head but it's not me"

Maybe that line would have been more accurate to say “the desire, or decision can only be made individually.” That can never be a mass movement, I’ve learned that now. In groups, people can only stand on the dots and flap their arms, or screech in unison and wave placards around. Maybe that’s fatalist.

you are right about the necessity of a multitude of individual self-sovereign people though, and also that it cannot be achieved in isolation. what’s happening now are parallel system build-outs, I’ve written a lot about that, and will again.

fused corporate-state power is a huge and negative thing, it has been for decades now and it is growing, but fatalism is not warranted. But there is potentially reason for hope, historically, systems at moments of stress or transition do not move along a single deterministic path; they branch, often sharply, depending on how institutional arrangements are contested and rebuilt, and the USA itself previously operated under a far more decentralized, federated, and pluralized architecture with diffused capital and locally embedded governance, show that alternative configurations are not just hypothetical

I don't invest in their things. I know that may sound moralistic. It certainly sounded that way to Rick Maybury and his coterie of sycophants thirty years ago when I refused to follow his advice and invest in mass murdering war monger companies. Yes, sure, it is somewhat more difficult to find good investments that have nothing to do with their garbage. But it remains possible.

On the whole, I would rather be stateless and free than involved in their …stuff. It probably does no good to mention that you cannot end cannibalism by eating cannibals. But you cannot.