Even if it was the NSA, the CCP
or the WEF

Rumours have abounded that Bitcoin was created by the NSA (or the CIA, or the CCP or WEFsters)  going back at least as far as 2010, or so.

They resurfaced over the past week when  Dr Mercola interviewed Catherine Austin Fitts. Since then I’ve had numerous readers forward me some choice quotes of their talk  (the transcript is here), and highlighting Fitts’ suspicion that Bitcoin was created non-altruistically by the NSA.

In it, there is a reference to Nic Carter’s theory about the NSA having created Bitcoin:

“The common understanding is that Nakamoto is the ultimate altruist and abandoned his 1 million Bitcoin for the benefit of humanity. Nic Carter is a well-known figure in the cryptocurrency community, and he doesn’t buy that story and is convinced that the United States National Security Agency (NSA) is responsible for creating Bitcoin. He believes Bitcoin was written by NSA cryptographers as a monetary bioweapon.^“

Mercola references this Cointelegraph article where Nic Carter clearly lays out that his NSA-origin theory for Bitcoin is “the lab leak” scenario:

“I call it the ‘Bitcoin lab leak hypothesis.’ I think it was a shuttered internal R&D project, which one researcher thought was too good to lay fallow on the shelf and chose to secretly release.”

Very much in line with the Promethean mythos behind the Satoshi Nakamoto legend that resonates so deeply throughout the community – and if true, might explain just why, the he/she/they/them that is Satoshi – left those 1 million BTC exactly where they sit today. Nobody would want to suffer the fate of Prometheus, doomed to spend eternity chained to a rock, having his liver eaten daily by an eagle.

Yet the discussion between Fitts and Mercola, as well as many others who suspect something nefarious behind Bitcoin’s mysterious creation, seem to be deriving the wrong conclusion from Carter’s theory – or dismissing it in favour of an intentional, deliberate creation, and presumably, what that would mean (as per Fitts),

“It depends on how their rollout of complete control works … As long as they have the ability to assert complete control and shut [crypto] down or marginalize it, it’s easy for [Mr. Global] to assert control. Until then, they can continue to pull money out of precious metals and real and hard assets by encouraging retail to go into crypto.”

The assumption being: whoever created Bitcoin, controls Bitcoin.

The reality is:

Bitcoin is beyond anyone’s control

And the reason, quite simply, is because Bitcoin is open source software.
What does “open source” mean and why does it matter to Bitcoin?
Contrast with something closed source and proprietary, like Microsoft Windows – or the entire Microsoft operating system stack, open source means that the instructions that comprise the computer program itself are published to the world openly in their uncompiled source code form.

Further, anybody running the software does so by downloading the open source copy of the code, compiling it locally and then running it.

What this means is that even if the NSA, or the CCP or the WEF secretly created and released Bitcoin intending it as a Trojan horse for digital slavery (like CBDCs will be), then we would all be able to literally see it in the source code, which is right here – and nobody would run it.

• There wouldn’t any Bitcoin devs maintaining the codebase (or if there was, they’d simply remove the malware)
• Nobody would be trading energy, or cash, for Bitcoin generated from compromised code, and
• Bitcoin miners would certainly not be spending hundreds of millions, or even billions of dollars in order to build out massive server farms to run NSA malware.

In other words, there would be zero market momentum behind the phenomenon known as “Bitcoin” that is sweeping the world.

Some others might concede that Bitcoin is an open source movement, with no hidden trojans or malware – but that it’s really One Big Psy-Op  to acclimatize us plebs to a cashless society using digital money.

The people who believe this might even tweet about it from their smart phone while sitting in a cafe sipping a latte that they just bought via ApplePay or tapping their chipped credit card (like that Mastercard that already cuts off your spending when your carbon footprint quota is exceeded).

You don’t need Bitcoin to brainwash people to accept a cashless society or even the coming CBDCs – huge swaths of the population are going to line up for that – and in my mind it will result in a kind of Monetary Apartheid.

Bitcoin is emergence, CBDCs are totalitarian.

The people who think Bitcoin is some kind of meat tenderizer to soften the public’s mind up for CBDCs have simply not been paying enough attention to:

1. The difference between Bitcoin and CBDCs, and
2. The difference between Bitcoin and other cryptos

It all comes down to the decentralized nature of the blockchain, the miners (Proof-of-Work) and self-custody of one’s own private keys vs centralized banking, centralized cryptos, faux-decentralized shitcoins and the like.

We even see this manifesting in legal policy in the US, as Bitcoin is the only digital asset being treated as a commodity while everything else is looking at being designated a security (even Ethereum, especially since that unforced error of switching to Proof-of-Stake).

---

---

Where people mistakenly think that Bitcoin is paving the way to usher in CBDCs, Bitcoin is actually the  anti-CBDC. It is the CBDC’s Kryptonite. An emerging monetary system as a response to the over-centralization of what I liked to call Late Stage Globalism, but lately I have become enamoured with George Gilder’s term: Emergency Socialism.

I’ll re-iterate a quote from my recent review of Ferdinand Lips classic, Gold Wars, about where monetary systems actually come from:

By 1900, approximately fifty countries were on a gold standard. including all industrialized nations. The interesting fact is that the modern gold standard was not planned at an international conference, nor was it invented by some genius. It came by itself, naturally and based on experience. 

The United Kingdom went on a gold standard against the intention of its government. Only much later did laws turn an operative gold standard into an officially sanctioned gold standard.

The same thing is happening today, with Bitcoin (yes, really).

Hyper-Bitcoinization vs Notgeld

In the early days of my involvement with the space, I too, dismissed claims that the global monetary system was destined for “Hyper-Bitcoinization” – I just didn’t think it would ever happen because central bankers would simply never allow it.

Instead, I viewed Bitcoin as a kind of “Notgeld” – a German term that emerged during the Weimar Hyper-inflation that translated to “Emergency Money”. In those days towns would print their own scrip. In later hyper-inflations, other things would emerge as “notgeld” – in Zimbabwe it was prepaid phone cards and gas coupons. Every hyperinflation had one. I thought Bitcoin was an emergent, global notgeld, but I never thought it would become anything “official”.

Then, two things happened that flipped me into the Hyper-Bitcoinization camp:

The first was when the ruling Liberal/Socialist coalition government of Canada weaponized the banking system against the #FreedomConvoy protestors, probably the one single act that orange pilled the most citizens globally since the Cyprus bail-in of 2013.

The other was when the US government seized the foreign reserves of two other governments. It doesn’t matter that those governments were Russia and The Taliban, doing so probably orange-pilled more than a few nation states.

What I also realized since then, namely watching the globalists attempt – and fail – to impose a permanent technocracy under Covid, was that what ultimately happens isn’t up to the central banks, and it’s not even up to the governments. It’s up to market forces – despite all the central planning and authoritarianism marshalled against it.

That won’t prevent them from trying, however. Which is where CBDCs come in.

Money backed by debt, becomes social credit backed by carbon quotas

In the latest issue of the premium newsletter (while analyzing an Agustín Carstens speech to the BIS working group on CBDCs)  I said:

Right now, what we call “the fiat world” uses debt for money. That’s no longer sustainable, so what we think will happen in the future is an attempt to switch what we loosely identify as “money”, from something backed by debt, to social credit scores, backed by carbon emissions.

When that comes, Bitcoin will not be some sort of gateway drug to CBDCs because there are fundamental incompatibilities, and there are other cryptos out there far more suited to the task – like Ethereum and Ripple, and who actually want to the global base layer for Central Bank Digital Currencies (after all, it’s not called WEFereum for nothing…)

So where we are headed – is a global economy where the world is either going to have to adopt a non-state, decentralized digital bearer asset or international trade flows will inexorably grind to halt as trust deteriorates right along with every fiat currency going.

And a social credit system where the majority of the population (everybody who has any reliance on The State for their economic sustenance) has their lives gamified via their smart phones and their carbon footprints rationed in the name of climate justice.

Marbled throughout this world (for as long as such a system will last, because ultimately, it can’t) there will be “network states” and enclaves of those who hold their wealth and earn their income outside the social credit/CBDC system.

In my next post, I’ll tackle the inevitable arguments that “governments will never allow people to escape the coming CBDC system” and show why, at the end of the day, they have no choice. It’s already beyond their control.

My forthcoming ebook The CBDC Survival Guide will give you the tools and the knowledge to navigate coming era of Monetary Apartheid. Bombthrower subscribers will get free when it drops, sign up today.

Follow me on Nostr, or Twitter.

The Five Big Takeaways from #Bitcoin2022 Miami

Last week was a blur: planes, trains and automobiles from Toronto through to Salt Lake City to tape a couple segments for Revealed Films. Then on to Miami for the largest cryptocurrency conference in the world, with an estimated 30,000-ish attendees showing up to take the decentralized revolution to the next level.

Here are the five big take-aways from this year’s conference:

#1) Bitcoin is well past the “here to stay” phase.

We’ve been hearing the “crypto is here to stay” mantra for a few years now. It’s not wrong, but frankly, we’re well beyond that point.  I knew as far back as 2017 that crypto wasn’t going anywhere, even after the 2018 bear market set in.

We’re now into the “Bitcoin is taking over the world” phase, a.k.a the early innings of hyper-Bitcoinization. Same as what happened with the Internet after the dotcom bust. Any credentialed experts who said the Internet was a glorified fax machine (ahem, Krugman) were wrong then and anybody still pounding the table about cryptos being backed by nothing and headed for zero (Schiff) are being proven wrong now.

The only question is to what extent Bitcoin overtakes the fiat economy, whether it becomes an official global reserve asset or functions outside the system entirely as increasingly more individuals and locales opt-out of the fiat world order.

Two more political autonomous zones did just that, announcing Bitcoin as legal tender:

• Madeira, an autonomous region of Portugal
• Prosperos, a private chartered city in Honduras

While Mexican Senator Indira Kempis came to the conference to announce that she’s introducing legislation to make Bitcoin legal tender in Mexico (Edit: Or not. She introduced a Bill to create a CBDC instead).

#2 There will be no crypto ban in the developed world

This is still a major factor in many people’s calculus on whether they should get involved with cryptos or not. It’s been clear in the US since at least the tuck-in to the COVID infrastructure bill (as ill formed as it is) that the US approach toward crypto will be a regulatory one, not prohibitory.

In the Cathy Woods, Michael Saylor fireside at the conference, Woods noted the change in rhetoric coming out of Janet Yellen in just the last year:

Last year Yellen was harping on  crypto’s use in illicit transactions. Now she’s talking about how they “are playing a significant role, not really so much in transactions, but in investment decisions of lots of Americans.”

“Somebody has been whispering into Yellen’s ear” opined Woods, her guess? SEC head Gary Gensler.

Saylor put the Biden executive order into context: “When was the last time the sitting President of the United States issued an executive order for all Federal agencies to get up to speed on an asset class?” – framing that as not presaging a crypto ban, but the de facto green light for the entire space.

There are numerous reasons for this, including:

1. Being a leading innovator in crypto is increasingly seen as a net-positive economically for the countries that adopt it
2. They provide a strategic advantage over countries that are attempting to ban it (China)
3. There is already too much institutional money already involved or positioning to get involved
4. With more than 30 million Americans and 300 million citizens globally HODL-ing, Bitcoiners are already a political constituency. There’s even a Bitcoin backed SuperPAC now whose stated aim is to rid the government of anti-Bitcoin politicians like Brad Sherman and Elizabeth Warren

#3 There can only be one

Over the past half year or so, as The Crypto Capitalist Letter was starting to gain steam, forcing me to pay even closer attention to all this, I noticed that I was becoming more of a Bitcoin Maximalist. Hopefully not a toxic one.

I still try to think like an investor and in that sense there will be successful projects and ecosystems outside of Bitcoin. I like Helium, for example. The idea of a mesh network being driven by incentives of hotspot operators is a compelling one. Given my dayjob running easyDNS, I pay particular attention to decentralized naming initiatives like ENS, HNS, Unstoppable and Stacks, although I still don’t see any clear winners here yet. On the privacy side, especially since the FreedomConvoy debacle here in Canada, I’ve become more interested in Monero.

But, like stocks (the tactical focus of TCC being crypto stocks), and as the case in most asset classes, the vast majority of contenders and aspirants are garbage, money grabs, often both.

Alas, where I had been previously thinking of Ethereum as the undisputed runner-up to Bitcoin, the silver to gold, the shine has been coming off for me.

The biggest existential challenge facing Ethereum is and always has been the gas fees.

The entire time I was monitoring Ethereum’s all encompassing transformation from Proof-of-Work to Proof-of-Stake, I just assumed that the merge to ETH2 would fix this. Then in late ’21, in places like Bankless and elsewhere, I started to see this notion being walked back.

Unpopular opinion (?) – but I find the entire effort of morphing into ETH2, screwing all the miners, radically restructuring everything and STILL not solving the gas fee problem… totally pointless. https://t.co/RM3xG0Vl8d

— https://bombthrower.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/shutterstock_1030471843-e1551983495127-1.jpg E. Jeftovic, The Crypto Capitalist (@StuntPope) April 10, 2022

It almost seems like Ethereum’s central management (which isn’t really a thing in Bitcoin, btw) decided to prioritize the perceived ESG (Environment/Social/Governance) benefits – which is most important to people who don’t actually understand crypto. Otherwise they would be cognizant of mining’s true energy usage (220 TWh for Bitcoin vs 160,000 TWh total global use = 0.0013). Further they would understand how PoW incentivizes clean and waste energy capture more effectively than anything else.

If you’re going to totally re-architect your protocol and marginalize those who were securing your network (the miners), at least address the single, core issue instead of all this technocratic posturing.

Ethereum is still a centralized and highly concentrated around a single key-man. They’ve changed their core monetary policy, they have a history of giving bailouts via hard forks (this is why we have Ethereum/ETH and Ethereum Classic/ETC).

Which means: Ethereum’s monetary policy is not immutable, and that means in the future anything can happen. Where Bitcoin will only ever have 21M BTC and always be Proof-of-Work, Ethereum could become an amusement park.

That doesn’t prevent Ethereum, or various projects deployed on it, from vastly increasing in price as cryptos continue their overall ascent. But if you make a boatload of money on it, move the profits into Bitcoin. If you build your project on Ethereum, you’ll want to have support for competing Layer 1’s. Especially if you’re successful.

This brings to light a paradox for Ethereum: any projects that launch and succeed on Ethereum will almost certainly branch out into other Layer 1 protocols (Polkadot, Near, Avalanche, Terra/LUNA, even  Binance Smart Chain) and cannibalize Ethereum. At least as long as they don’t address this gas fee issue, and they’re in the process of squandering their last best chance to do so.

Said differently, I don’t see anything on the horizon that could dethrone Bitcoin as the preeminent monetary crypto-asset. But I see plenty of competitors all chipping away at Ethereum. This includes Bitcoin’s own extensions that are building momentum. Lightning not only has the potential to provide Visa-level transaction processing throughput, but messaging and who knows what else. With Taproot here, we have the foundation for adding asset issuance functionality with proposals like Taro.

What finally did it for me was to see the early innings of cancel culture within the Ethereum community. It made me realize we’re dealing increasingly with virtue signalling and less so with the decentralized revolution. Make no mistake: Cancel culture is cancer. Once it gains a foothold and becomes normalized, the host is doomed. I fear that failure will be the norm for most DAOs as those who are able to shriek the loudest will distort and hijack most of them from their core missions, whatever those may be.

As I thought all this through last week I moved about 20% of my ETH into wBTC, which (sooner than later) I’ll move across a bridge into native BTC. I have about 40% staked on Beacon Chain, which I’m fine leaving there to earn some yield (approx. 4.5% APY).

#4 This is more than an asset, it’s a spiritual philosophy

The Thank God For Bitcoin conference ran a one day event concurrent with Bitcoin2022. There is a larger contingent of Christians within Bitcoin than I realized. Beyond that there is a general sense of the underlying spirituality behind a movement that truly restores economic sovereignty to anybody who wants it, with effectively zero barriers to entry.

That there is a spiritual component to sound money is not new. Gold carried (carries?) the same gravitas amongst the most highly respected and penetrating intellectual minds throughout history that has endured into today.

Jordan B Peterson came to #Bitcoin2022 and one of his most well known lectures is around the psychological meaning of the Tower of Babel parable. In a fireside with Tuur Demester he drew a through line from it to Austrian School Economics to Brexit. And it made perfect sense because Babel is a story of technocratic hubris, very similar to what we are subjected to on a mass scale today.

He built on that in the after-conference event with Robert Breedlove, citing the Austrian school notion that monetary integrity and moral integrity are inextricably linked.

“What is Money?” dialogue between @Breedlove22 and @jordanbpeterson #Bitcoin2022 pic.twitter.com/Wlt1pjsY4B

— https://bombthrower.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/shutterstock_1030471843-e1551983495127-1.jpg E. Jeftovic, The Crypto Capitalist (@StuntPope) April 9, 2022

This exact sentiment has always been considered the  very nature of sound money. The legendary commentator Harry Shultz, as quoted by Ferdinand Lips in his seminal work Gold Wars:

“Money sets a standard that spreads into every area of human activity. No paper money backing, no morality….Layer by layer we are corrupted when money loses certainty… Big Brother was made possible through the absence of automatic controls and loss of individual freedom via non-convertible currency. So, pass the word. Fight for gold. Not for profits, though they are helpful and help us fight for individual freedom, but for a future that returns to sanity in various standards. If we have a gold standard we get golden human standard! The two are intertwined. They are the ultimate cause and effect. Gold blesses.”

There really is something below the surface, something much more than Bitcoin as digital gold, or cryptos as a new asset class or even a global monetary regime change. For me it comes down to what I think will be considered the geocentrism of our age. Geocentrism was the belief that the heavens revolved around the Earth, which was the center of the cosmos. This was “settled science” for thousands of years and in those days “deniers” were burned at the stake.

Today’s geocentric pseudo-science is the idea that material reality precedes consciousness. That our minds are a byproduct of our brains. This is actually backwards. All manifest reality really emanates  from a non-material something (call it, “God”, Spirit, quantum foam, Bohm’s implicate order, etc) and global, historical currents and directionality comes from there. Somewhere.

In “Faith of a Futurist” George Gilder (pro gold, pro Bitcoin) posits a reversion from the radical material reductionism of the 20th century as we rediscover the spiritual core of existence and regain our ascent into global prosperity:

The twentieth century has been an era when an atheistic belief in the ultimacy of matter and the triviality of man led to the horrors of Nazism, Communism, and an epoch of total war. Now sweeping through the global economy, the overthrow of matter will unleash an undertow of [spiritual] belief that will make the new millennium a time of awakening to the oceanic grandeur and goodness of the universe. An economy of ideas and innovations ultimately means an economy ruled by spirit and faith.

That’s where the impetus toward civilization originates, its where universal human rights emerge from, it why consciousness evolves over time up an ascending scale of increasing mental abstraction and it’s from where this impulse toward decentralization and non-State money germinates.  That’s why it is unstoppable.

At the conference I found this underlying spiritual driver behind Bitcoin to be palpable.

#5 The War on ‘Woke’ Capitalism has begun

Finally, we come to the punchline to Bitcoin2022….

That was Peter Thiel’s keynote which I described as a declaration of war against “Woke Capitalism”.

You can view it in it’s entirety below,

A more accurate TL,DR (from somebody who was in the room) is that Peter Thiel called out “The Gerontocracy” – filled with oligarchs and plutocrats like Warren Buffet, Jamie Dimon and Larry Fink and he said they were driving this ESG narrative to further ensconce their own interests and power. Further, the logical outcome of ESG is China-style social credit.

Of course Thiel is right. We can focus on the energy usage question alone: if we concede that any outside “authority” has the moral claim to moderate energy usage for Proof-of-Work mining then you just ceded discretion over all of your energy usage to that authority.

Just suppose that Bitcoin mining were to be somehow squashed today on environmental grounds (and you may agree, provided you’re completely ignorant of Bitcoin’s actual energy usage and incentives).

That means tomorrow you’ll earn demerits for turning on your dishwasher during peak hours. Heated bathroom floors will be banned as Bourgeoisie decadence. This will all be decided by committees that you aren’t on or algos you have zero control over or visibility into.

The True Cost of Wokeness

Germany is scrambling, looking at rationing power and in the early stages of reversing their own policy of shutting down their nuclear reactors. They are even considering recommissioning coal fired plants. It turns out you can’t heat the nation on hot air and platitudes.

Meanwhile the US government is begging Communist a dictatorship like Venezuela and a fundamentalist theocracy like Iran for oil, while Canada’s tar sands, among the highest proven reserves on earth, literally next door, can’t fulfill demand because the Liberal Socialists incumbent in both countries won’t let the pipeline projects be completed (But rail lines are packed to capacity moving that same oil, more dangerously and at lower throughputs… that may be bad for the country but business is booming for railway owners, including Uncle Buffet).

As these externalities and second-order effects come home to roost, Thiel’s speech came at an inflection point. He finally said what many have known or suspected for a long time, but may have ben hesitant to vocalize because the completely captive media and Big Tech cartel would unleash legions of cancel culture beserkers upon anybody foolhardy enough to speak the truth.

The true cost of wokeness is beginning to hit home, we’re seeing it first at the gas pumps here in North America. We’re seeing it in energy shortages and rationing abroad.

Next up: out of control food inflation. They don’t call them “meal”-worms for nothing…

Here’s the summary I did for Steve Bannon’s Warroom after the conference

The veneer on Woke Capitalism is coming off, and everybody knows it.

The world is undergoing a monetary regime change. Get the Crypto Capitalist Manifesto free, when you join the Bombthrower mailing list. Follow me as @bombthrower on Gettr or if you haven’t been kicked off Twitter (yet), @StuntPope