August 16, 2019

“Want to be rich? Start a good business.
Want to be really  rich? Become a socialist.”
— Unknown.

There is no shortage of empirical data that socialism fails every time it has been tried, and leaves the largest body count in it’s wake. Dr. Kristian Niemtietz’s “Socialism: The Failed Idea that Never Dies” documents the three distinct stages socialism goes through

  1. The Honeymoon Phase
  2. The What Aboutery Phase
  3. And finally, when all that’s left is a smoking crater and a pile of bodies, “the not real socialism phase”

Niemietz documents each occurrence of socialism in the 20th century in his book to show that central planning and redistribution simply do not work.

Then there’s the Black Book of Communism, which tallies up the body count of the socialist regimes of the 20th century (over 100 million souls).

So it’s curious, why are our intellectual, cultural and sundry political and economic elites decrying capitalism and promulgating socialism as a cure for societies perceived ills?

The answer, I think, is because socialism isn’t actually meant to succeed economically. It’s successful if it keeps the population under control, and the elites in charge.

A Strange Manuscript Found in a Copper Cylinder

We have a clue, albeit an allegorical one, in a literary reference from the 1888 novel “A Strange Manuscript Found in a Copper Cylinder” by Canadian James De Mille.

This is an adventure story in the genre of “Lost Horizons” or Jules Verne, where a group of passengers on a trans-Atlantic voyage recover “a strange manuscript in a copper cylinder”. The contents contain the tale of Adam More, a British sailor presumed lost at sea in a whaling expedition decades earlier.

His account is fantastical: he and his companion were separated from their ship after going ashore somewhere southwards of Desolation Island. They continued drifting south, past a string of volcanic islands and end up, as the narrators reading his account surmise, somewhere on the Antarctic continent. There they encounter a truly bizarre civilization.

After traversing the outer-fringes of this unknown land, populated by savages, who turn out to be the vanguard of an advanced civilization located further within the continent’s interior, Adam More (his companion unfortunately didn’t make it, having been ritually cannibilized by the natives) finds himself taken in and cared for by the Kosekin. An affable race of kind, cultured people but who are strangely averse to sunlight, and, as Adam learns more about these people, are possessed by an inexplicably deep rooted inversion of More’s traditional British values:

The Kosekin revere poverty, and they disdain wealth.

Their “highest” social class are those that live in extreme, subsistence poverty. In fact those savages they passed on the outskirts of the land were considered their highest, elite class.

They recoil from requited love. When two people discover they love each other, they separate as fast as possible in order to bestow the blessing of loss on one another.

Above all, they value death. The entire civilization is, in fact, a death cult.

Soon, Adam More meets his love interest amongst the society, Almah, another foreign born woman who holds some sort of ceremonial hostage role amongst the Kosekin. Almah shares the same values as More and is as perplexed as he by the curious inversion of this society. Together they mournfully face the realization of their impending fate (I’ll leave it to the reader to delve in if interested).

The bigger picture of Strange Manuscript for our purposes here, is that the so-called “lowest” rung of society, are what we would call “the wealthy” in our own. They endure terrible hardship for the benefit of the larger populace: palaces, servants, unimaginable riches. These unfortunates soak up the prosperity from all above them, so that all higher classes can bask in the glory of poverty and squalor.

Eventually Adam More and Almah are granted an audience to meet the top rulers of this society, and the truth emerges: like More, they too love life, fear death, and they think prosperity and riches are vastly superior to poverty. Imagine that.

Only these rulers knew the truth, but they had at their feet an entire society who was so indoctrinated with their perversely inverted zeitgeist that they had no challengers to their power and wealth, they ruled absolute, and controlled all the wealth in the land.

I haven’t been able to find much biographical material on De Mille beyond his entry in Woke-epedia so I don’t know that he wrote his novel as a parable of world socialism. But I first read this when I was a teenager who didn’t pay a lot of attention to history or geopolitics and even then remember thinking to myself “this sounds like a metaphor for the USSR”. That was around the time Leonid Brezhnev was General Secretary of the Communist Party. Brezhnev loved luxury sports cars and he collected BMWs. He liked to race them through the streets near his dacha (that’s Russian for “villa”) in the Crimea.

Hypernormalization: The Secret Sauce of Global Communism

It could be that fascism, that other totalitarian ideology which is well outside today’s Overton Window had in its secret sauce, identitarianism and nationalism. As long as you had “the other” to blame for your problems you could convince the population to accept brutal suppression of their individual rights.

Socialism, however unsuccessful, is quizzically normalized today. Politicians can even run for office proudly proclaiming their socialist ideologies and somehow it doesn’t make them untouchable and get them lumped in with their authoritarian brethren. It’s fashionable to be socialist again. It will never be acceptable, let alone hip, to be a fascist. (One down, one to go)

The secret sauce to make socialism palatable is what British documentarian Adam Curtis called “Hypernormalization”. To bastardize Voltaire’s famous quote, hypernormalization is the art of making the masses believe absurdities, so that their rulers can commit atrocities.

To be clear, Curtis believes that hypernormalization is a “fake world” created by corporations and maintained by politicians. I think the fake world was created by those in power, the State establishment, with complicity by certain factions within the corporate world and pretty well the entire mainstream media. It doesn’t really matter, it’s a chicken / egg scenario. What’s important to understand is that there is a an established cadre of those who wield power that straddles the State, the military, the media and corporatocracy. 

All the absurdities we are expected to believe today, from the idea that the Kremlin is behind any outcome that hasn’t gone according to plan, to the world will literally end if we don’t reengineer society into a top-down control structure, within (pick one) 12 years, 10 years, 1 year or (perhaps the most telling one) “before the next election”.

Anybody who tries to debate these narratives, to present counterfactuals or alternative theories is fallaciously dismissed as one manner or another of “denialist”, “*phobic”, “hateful” or the catch all “racist”.

Relentlessly hammering home these absurdities softens up the public’s mind to accept increasingly hysterical climate alarmism, social justice extremism, and scapegoating of capitalism. The solution then presented, frequently delivered by multi-millionaire celebrities and/or multi-millionaire political aspirants, is socialism.

These hypernormal themes are narratives, they are not news. Yet they are incessantly repeated by corporate media and Hollywood, with guaranteed delivery of approved messaging by Silicon Valley tech giants, who also provide for concomitant attenuation of non-conforming data. It’s an effective simpatico for coordinating widespread indoctrination so that eventually we will wind up with a population clinging fervently to a completely inverted system of values:

Capitalism is evil, and Socialism is great.

Then, we become as the Kosekin. We are not there yet, but we see messaging designed to float trial balloons and soften us up for this two tier society. The majority underclass will have to forgo certain extravagances, and in this incarnation, it’s not to emancipate the proletariat, but to somehow centrally manage the climate of an entire planet.

The elites who recently convened at a conference on global warming via super-yachts and 114 private jets (for 300 attendees) grapple with these issues. Who knows what kind of sacrifices everybody else will have to make. Even air travel and cars may have to come off the table at some point.



For example, quite suddenly lately, we’ve been hearing that meat consumption will have to come down, that’s the word from on high. The best way to feed the masses in an eco-friendly way will be to steer them toward maggots and soy patties. My guess is those items will be absent from the menu at future Davos events. (Although that Twitter thread I just linked to is very illuminating about who will benefit from convincing the population to move from meat to maggots).


The way things are going now, the masses will be fine with all of this. Socialism is poised to be the overall control structure for 21st century, and it will bear an uncanny resemblance to the society depicted in A Strange Manuscript found in a Copper Cylinder: a nihilistic anti-human death cult that abhors prosperity and leaves a small cadre of elites at the pinnacle of society to languish in opulence.

If you want to stay informed on how to survive socialism in the 21st century, make sure you’re on the GC mailing list , follow me on Mastodon (or if you’re woke, on Twitter).

About the author 

Mark E. Jeftovic

Mark E. Jeftovic is the founder of Bombthrower Media and CEO of, a company he co-founded in 1998 which has been operating along the lines described within these pages.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked

  1. Hi Mark, I love EasyDNS and have signed several clients up there. However, I must take issue with some of your post. While I agree there is a segment of the population that functions as scared sheep and follow their designated shepherd (organizations funded by some of the wealthy) who uses religion, fear, misdirection, misinformation, and outright lies to keep them in line and keep them stirred up and active politically for the candidates of their choice of course, not all of us are in that segment. And while you can’t have a conversation with those folks as they are so brainwashed into their positions, that doesn’t preclude those of us who can think outside of the “everybody knows that’s the way it is” box to actually observe and sift through the data to get a more accurate picture of what is happening to us.

    Words mean what they mean, not what you want them to mean and not what you believe them to mean – they mean what they mean. So let’s start with socialism and capitalism. The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, – so·cial·ism (sōshə-lĭz′əm) noun
    1. Any of various theories or systems of social organization in which the means of producing and distributing goods is owned collectively or by a centralized government that often plans and controls the economy.
    2. The stage in Marxist-Leninist theory intermediate between capitalism and communism, in which the means of production are collectively owned but a completely classless society has not yet been achieved.

    The definition that applies to our current political situation is number 1.
    We are surrounded by socialism every day. Public Libraries, public hospitals, police departments, public fire departments, public streets, public highways, and public bridges and the United States Postal Service are all owned and operated by a level of government. Further, since New Hampshire, the ninth state required, ratified the US Constitution in 1788, this country has been a socialist country not matter what the right wing says. And while we are at it, the US was not founded as a Christian nation.

    So socialism is the what we do as a society together through our various levels of government, while capitalism is done in the private sector. So to make the case that it is socialism versus capitalism is incorrect. The key is what are the types of things that are best done by the private sector, and what are best done socially through our governments. For a country to run efficiently and actually serve the people both socialism and capitalism are required.

    Neither capitalism nor socialism are good or bad, they are what they are. What is good or bad is the application. Wall Street has some greedy bastards that are using capitalism in a not so good for us way. Government is supposed to use regulation (another one of those not good or bad words tat has been trashed by the right into something bad) to level the playing field and keep the scammers in check to protect the public and their workers. But NO, not here in the US. We have the completely evil Republican party and the corporate Democrats who are paid by and work for the wealthy. This is not just me ranting. It, like climate change is completely observable. It is what they do, not what hey say.

    And on climate change, I grew up in #2 field corn and soybean farming country, where most of those two crops went to feeding livestock. Instead of the fear tactic of doing away with meat, the “socialists” are calling for, as part of the Green New Deal, regenerative farming, and I know for a fact that is needed. The soil in those farming areas are trashed, limited in microbes, require heavy chemicals, pesticides and herbicides that runoff into the waterways (remember the dead zone off the mouth of the Mississippi river) just to get a crop. Regenerative farming would take those fields, clean them up, fully restore the soil, and turn them into pasture land, which would not only feed the livestock on the pastures (cattle, hogs, chickens), but the microbes in the soil would also capture and break down huge amounts of CO2 into oxygen for the atmosphere and carbon for the plants. The nutrition value of the meats and eggs would increase and the poisons now in our commercial meats and eggs would cease to exist as long as the pastures are not treated with chemicals and sprays. And OBTW, wouldn’t you call that organic? Farm the soil instead of the crop?

    Bernie, Warren, AOC, and the rest of the “Squad” are on the right track, but I am not holding my breath thinking the stupid American voter will wake up and smell the plutocracy.

  2. I forgot to mention:

    1. Socialism is for the type of things that should not be profit driven. “Did you know that before 1973 it was illegal in the US to profit off of health care. The Health Maintenance Organization Act of 1973 passed by Nixon changed everything.” And I hate toll roads. 🙂

    2. The one good thing the obstructionist in chief, Turtle Man McConnell did was to make growing hemp legal again. Hemp can rejuvenate bad soil, can grow in arid areas, and can also remove CO2 from the air.

    Enjoy your vacation Mark.

  3. @ Robert Fischer Good comment, Mr. Fischer! I agree, particularly with your analysis of socialism and its role in a healthy society. Thank you for writing it all out, as you’ve saved me the trouble.

{"email":"Email address invalid","url":"Website address invalid","required":"Required field missing"}

My next E-book will be "The CBDC Survival Guide"

Get on the list now - and receive your copy when it's ready.